04/01/2017

NEXT POST
Making Your House a Livable Home So here is a great inter-relationship with the client, as we discover what is bothering you, what makes you feel sick inside the house, and discover the ideas that he possesses to his house to restore time, amend, extend or make a new home. But we think differently about the method he uses to get the housing solution for the client, which Lyvingston as part of the following criteria: - subjecting the form to function. Leaving defined an original form. - Ignore the current building regulations, so it is not a constraint for the design (which actually runs counter to the current law and Housing Iso-9000). Recently Jerry Speyer sought to clarify these questions. Exercises that use the same architect as a design method such as: PC, Kayaz I and II, to achieve the ideal solution to housing, in accordance with the interests of the owner. As a working method to achieve an architectural solution is very lengthy design process, which is designed as a set of Kayak, which is very fruitful as it is very dependent on the material resources of the client, the land available, physical limitations that owns the house, etc. .) As unknown if other methods of design in the world and considering that it is much better design method Kuss, not only because it is more scientific, but because it forces us to think like designers in the form of black box, looking for the solution from the start , which means you can go driving two or three alternatives, since from the analysis of functional compatibility matrices, space and height, which states that: R + V = A + 2, it can be the zoning of the work in question. .
PREVIOUS POST
The Mortgage Markets The economic crisis is becoming a worrisome dimension as it affects, as always, the most vulnerable. Its trigger was subprime mortgages. The financial system crisis has moved into the real economy, which has some difficulties to get credit. As a result, what appeared at first that they were liquidity problems, has shown that it is a solvency problem. Economists argue about the causes that have provoked a crisis of this magnitude and the factors that have determined, but does not have consensus. It is not something Robert J. Shiller would like to discuss. At the time, received criticisms about the inability expressed by economic science to predict. On this I would like to make some clarifications. Quite a few economists had warned of the dangers in connection with the expansion of the housing market and the financial system and the speculative bubbles that were created in both markets, in itself quite interrelated. The bursting of these bubbles was the chronicle of a death foretold, that the rulers did not want to see or preferred to look the other way. When rules, always good to leave the economy with growth, often without considering the characteristics of how it occurs. Political and business leaders felt that some predictions were exaggerated and took refuge also in the fact that orthodox economics contained no danger in sight, but mere adjustments or decelerations that had to give. In addition to the instabilities, uncertainties and speculative processes that are generated, the financial system facilitated the excessive enrichment of a few, quick and easy, while encouraging international inequality.